New Videos

World Cup 2019 Final | Super Over | ENG vs NZ | EA Sports Cricket 07



It was never going to be easy, was it? Two teams without a World Cup title between them in 44 years of the men’s competition. After 100 overs, the last couple of which contained almost as much drama as a few previous finals in their entirety, nothing could separate England and New Zealand.

Asked to score 16 from six balls in the Super Over, Jimmy Neesham coolly struck Jofra Archer’s second legitimate delivery way back into the Mound Stand, making the equation seven off four. A brace of twos followed, before Archer’s bumper took Neesham off strike.

Martin Guptill, at the end of a tournament of personal trial, needing to hit two more otherwise England would take the trophy on boundaries scored. Archer found a yorker, Guptill found deep midwicket and Jason Roy’s throw found Guptill short; Jos Buttler completed the run-out at full stretch to end all those years of hurt and an afternoon of exquisite agony.

England had only got close in their chase thanks to Buttler and Ben Stokes whose 110-run stand lifted the home nation from peril at 86 for 4. The pair walked out again to scramble 15 from an over of Trent Boult to put pressure back on New Zealand.

They responded by sending out Neesham, a man who not so long ago was contemplating quitting the game, to face Archer, in his 14th ODI. Only one could finish a hero.

For the first time in World Cup history, a Super Over was required to determine the winner!
We RE-CREATE it in EA Sports Cricket 2007. Watch on! 😁

#BenStokes #CricketWorldCup #CWC2019

Related Articles

24 Comments

  1. 1) Terrible terrible umpiring by Kumar Dharmsena. No way should he have awarded those 4 extra runs to English team. The result still hurts.
    2) Williamson shouldn't have given the ball to Boult in the super over, Ferguson should have been given the ball. He was spewing fire that day and had bowled better than Boult.
    3) In the end , a match decided on basis of boundaries was just disgusting. There should have been another super over ideally. If not that, judging the match on basis of wickets lost would have made more sense (like was done in 1980s). Getting a wicket is tougher than hitting a boundary. This fucking rule just reinforced that modern cricket is batsman centric and doesn't value to bowler.
    4) Naseer Hossain in the end says cricket was the winner, no Nass, cricket was the LOSER. SORE LOSER. This is one among many reasons cricket can NEVER overtake soccer, rugby or hockey. They don't have shitty rules like this.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button